what do you guys think?

Got some genuine, reliable primary sources that back that up? 60% of all bodies is hundreds of thousands of bodies. I feel that would be more common, for one thing all the skulls lying around people homes in America.

(21-01-2017 06:54 PM)dogmatix Wrote:  Got some genuine, reliable primary sources that back that up? 60% of all bodies is hundreds of thousands of bodies. I feel that would be more common, for one thing all the skulls lying around people homes in America.

look up allied war crimes on wikipedia says it plainly there

So, no you don't have a proper primary source for your claim.

Found your stat. It was from one single battle site. Not 60% of all the Pacific. Not only this, it was actively condemned by the Allied High Command.

(21-01-2017 08:02 PM)dogmatix Wrote:  So, no you don't have a proper primary source for your claim.

Found your stat. It was from one single battle site. Not 60% of all the Pacific. Not only this, it was actively condemned by the Allied High Command.

doesnt mean they stopped doing it? and it was more then one battle site lol

provide multiple sources that are not wikipedia as that shit can be changed by anyone

allied soldiers found bodies of fallen comrades or POW's that had flesh stripped off their bodies so the jap officers would have it cooked and served to them at dinner

https://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~changmin/d...8-3-06.pdf
https://www.amazon.com/Other-Nuremberg-U...0688079571
http://www.frontpagemag.com/point/247337...greenfield
http://www.smh.com.au/national/archives-...2uzrd.html
http://ahrp.org/hidden-horrors-japanese-...nnibalism/

(21-01-2017 08:23 PM)Welldone the Pussyhand Wrote:  

(21-01-2017 08:02 PM)dogmatix Wrote:  So, no you don't have a proper primary source for your claim.

Found your stat. It was from one single battle site. Not 60% of all the Pacific. Not only this, it was actively condemned by the Allied High Command.

doesnt mean they stopped doing it? and it was more then one battle site lol

It means there was a concerted effort to stop it. You said 60% of all Japanese bodies found in the pacific, but the wikipedia article you were apparently getting your information from says it was 60% of bodies on the Marianas Islands.

(22-01-2017 01:14 AM)Geebus Wrote:  allied soldiers found bodies of fallen comrades or POW's that had flesh stripped off their bodies so the jap officers would have it cooked and served to them at dinner

https://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~changmin/d...8-3-06.pdf
https://www.amazon.com/Other-Nuremberg-U...0688079571
http://www.frontpagemag.com/point/247337...greenfield
http://www.smh.com.au/national/archives-...2uzrd.html
http://ahrp.org/hidden-horrors-japanese-...nnibalism/

ah well i no longer care whos right or wrong. this has evolved from figures to ship captains to pacific theater atrocities

It has, though obviously you're wrong.

Hate to burst both your bubbles but if we talking naval commanders and not worrying about tech I'll stick to Yi Sun-sin. He'd kick both their asses and still have time for a cup of tea.