Enable signatures?

(28-05-2013 06:52 PM)OldAussie Wrote:  

(28-05-2013 04:20 PM)Jazza Wrote:  Cat/OldAussie: It's much too distracting.

The purpose of forum signatures are to sign off your posts and provide people with a mini bio and links to things related to you, not to distract readers from your actual posts. I've seen forums that allow images in signatures that are taller than the post and even the page itself. It's ridiculous.

Yo Jazza I have made that many Sigs over the years for Clans all over the world that I've lost count I've made plain ones Animated and some with Film clips in them and never got told they were too big or ridiculous but your the boss so if you let us know what size you would like them to be that would be great

No offense but times have changed. Websites and forums are throwing out the old school way of cluttering up everything with flashy banners and have moved to simple and clean designs.

I'll enable signatures, but I'll limit their heights to something short but not too short.

(29-05-2013 03:55 PM)Jazza Wrote:  

(28-05-2013 06:52 PM)OldAussie Wrote:  

(28-05-2013 04:20 PM)Jazza Wrote:  Cat/OldAussie: It's much too distracting.

The purpose of forum signatures are to sign off your posts and provide people with a mini bio and links to things related to you, not to distract readers from your actual posts. I've seen forums that allow images in signatures that are taller than the post and even the page itself. It's ridiculous.

Yo Jazza I have made that many Sigs over the years for Clans all over the world that I've lost count I've made plain ones Animated and some with Film clips in them and never got told they were too big or ridiculous but your the boss so if you let us know what size you would like them to be that would be great

No offense but times have changed. Websites and forums are throwing out the old school way of cluttering up everything with flashy banners and have moved to simple and clean designs.

I'll enable signatures, but I'll limit their heights to something short but not too short.

Yo Jazza Not sure you are right about throwing out the old school I just had a wiz around some of the gaming clan even Cat clan (TOG) and the average size of Sig I could see was 500px X 100 px and 500px X 150 px so what size are you going to let us use

MOAR GREAT SIGS

(29-05-2013 04:44 PM)OldAussie Wrote:  

(29-05-2013 03:55 PM)Jazza Wrote:  

(28-05-2013 06:52 PM)OldAussie Wrote:  

(28-05-2013 04:20 PM)Jazza Wrote:  Cat/OldAussie: It's much too distracting.

The purpose of forum signatures are to sign off your posts and provide people with a mini bio and links to things related to you, not to distract readers from your actual posts. I've seen forums that allow images in signatures that are taller than the post and even the page itself. It's ridiculous.

Yo Jazza I have made that many Sigs over the years for Clans all over the world that I've lost count I've made plain ones Animated and some with Film clips in them and never got told they were too big or ridiculous but your the boss so if you let us know what size you would like them to be that would be great

No offense but times have changed. Websites and forums are throwing out the old school way of cluttering up everything with flashy banners and have moved to simple and clean designs.

I'll enable signatures, but I'll limit their heights to something short but not too short.

Yo Jazza Not sure you are right about throwing out the old school I just had a wiz around some of the gaming clan even Cat clan (TOG) and the average size of Sig I could see was 500px X 100 px and 500px X 150 px so what size are you going to let us use

I set it to 100px tall before you replied.

In another forum I ran I set it to 32px and it worked surprisingly well. It looked more like a signature and less like a Flash banner advertisement.

Whoops there was some old code that I forgot to remove. Should be working now (may need to refresh your page a few times).

it really needs to be taller


EDIT: oh it seems to look really good on other parts of the forum, but here looks like poo poo. well tickle me confused

I wonder what my sig looks like.

(30-05-2013 01:54 AM)kimjungillex Wrote:  EDIT: oh it seems to look really good on other parts of the forum, but here looks like poo poo. well tickle me confused

You may need to refresh your page to get the new code. Your browser likes to cache it to make page loading faster, but means developers like me have to get around it to publish changes. This time I'm being lazy and not forcing you to re-download it.